# 07 MT VIEW LANE

Vacation Rental Reviews

• Review by Marlis P

  Stayed 3 days in May, 2010

  • Services from rental manager
    
  • Cleanliness
    
  • Location
    
  • Property condition
    

  Overall satisfaction:

  Marlis P from Ridgefield, WA recommends this vacation rental

•  

• Nice home, well priced

  Stayed 4 days in February, 2010

  • Services from rental manager
    
  • Cleanliness
    
  • Location
    
  • Property condition
    

  Overall satisfaction:

  Angela D from Vancouver, WA recommends this vacation rental

  It was clean, well maintained. It was a little difficult to find at first. The only real complaint about the house layout is that to get to one of the rooms upstairs you have to walk through another room (unless you walk all the way around and use a different staircase on the other side of the house). It would be better if that room was off a hallway... otherwise the house was great and well priced!

•  

• Review by a guest

  Stayed 4 days in January, 2010

  • Services from rental manager
    
  • Cleanliness
    
  • Location
    
  • Property condition
    

  Overall satisfaction:

  a guest from Salem, OR recommends this vacation rental

  Perfectly fine place to stay. Good location. Beds could be a updated, a little better lightbulbs in lamps. Need a new can opener. Love the kid friendly room, a place for them to play out of the way.

•  

• We enjoyed our stay inspite of the house.

  Stayed 5 days in December, 2009

  • Services from rental manager
    
  • Cleanliness
    
  • Location
    
  • Property condition
    

  Overall satisfaction:

  a guest from College Place, WA does not recommend this vacation rental.

  The house has the basics covered. Plenty of silverware and plates. My bed was not new but up to Motel 6 standards. Reasonable couches in the living room. The plumbing did not block and the roof did not leak. <br/>Couple complaints:<br/>1) dim lighting, no where to read except at the dinning room table. This alone put our family group on edge.<br/>2) there are only six dinning room chairs in a house for ten. the white plastic from outside look bad even after scrubbing. <br/>3)The ceiling fan does not work which leads to a very hot upstairs and a freezing living room floor. Ski clothes also did not dry overnight

  • Manager Responded on 2/4/2010

    We're sorry this home didn't fit your needs we'll get that ceiling fan fixed as well as the lighting. Next time we'll find you a home that will better suit your needs. Thank you for taking the time to let us know, Discover Sunriver Vacation Rentals 1-544-0300

  • Manager Responded on 2/4/2010

    We're sorry this home didn't fit your needs we'll get that ceiling fan fixed as well as the lighting. Next time we'll find you a home that will better suit your needs. Thank you for taking the time to let us know, Discover Sunriver Vacation Rentals

•  

• Just OK

  Stayed 2 days in November, 2009

  • Services from rental manager
    
  • Cleanliness
    
  • Location
    
  • Property condition
    

  Overall satisfaction:

  a guest from Corvallis, Oregon does not recommend this vacation rental.

  I've stayed in every region of SR over the last 15 years.<br/>Good management, decent size, one bedroom good for kids, clean. Master bedroom required heat management with pillows to avoid being cooked.<br/>No WiFi, no coffee filters, no solid surface on driveway (dirt). Needs maintenance and heat system rework.

•  

• We had a great time

  Stayed 3 days in July, 2009

  • Services from rental manager
    
  • Cleanliness
    
  • Location
    
  • Property condition
    

  Overall satisfaction:

  Linda O from Portland, OR recommends this vacation rental

  We had a great time - especially enjoyed the bikes. The house was great - the only problem was the disposal - but that was o.k.

  • Manager Responded on 7/23/2009

    Glad maintenance were able to fix that for you. Thanks, Discover Sunriver

•  

• Great location but Mavericks Access is not what you think. The Flowrider IS NOT FREE. Other websites spell out the cost but Discover does not.

  Stayed 9 days in July, 2009

  • Services from rental manager
    
  • Cleanliness
    
  • Location
    
  • Property condition
    

  Overall satisfaction:

  Patricia W from Albany, OR recommends this vacation rental

  At $20.00 a short session, most young people could not afford this activity. Not even the attendant at the front desk nor any of the printed material hinted at it either. Overall the home had a nice layout.

•  

• Review by a guest

  Stayed 3 days in March, 2009

  • Services from rental manager
    
  • Cleanliness
    
  • Location
    
  • Property condition
    

  Overall satisfaction:

  a guest from beaverton, OR recommends this vacation rental

•  

• Review by a guest

  Stayed 8 days in August, 2008

  • Services from rental manager
    
  • Cleanliness
    
  • Location
    
  • Property condition
    

  Overall satisfaction:

  a guest from Fair Oaks, CA recommends this vacation rental

  The deck was in great need of repair. Too splintery. also all exterior doors need to be fixed. sliding door too hard to lock along with the side door and the front door screen is very hard to unlock. found cockroaches in upstairs large bedroom.

  • Manager Responded on 11/26/2008

    Michelle, we will look into this and get things handled. Sorry you had these problems.

•  

• July 2009 at #7 Mt View lane, Sunriver, OR

  Stayed 3 days in July, 2008

  • Services from rental manager
    
  • Cleanliness
    
  • Location
    
  • Property condition
    

  Overall satisfaction:

  a guest from Salem, OR recommends this vacation rental

  The major issue was problems with ants in the kitchen. I called the office and someone came over the next morning and sprayed the kitchen, but we continued to see ants in the kitchen. This was a major problem with some of people in the house. No hair dryer on premises, but one was brought later in the day. Doors do not open and close easily- needs maintenance. Bikes in closet need maintenance/repair. Beds were fine and living area was adequate.

•